Re: [Pkg-ime-devel] RFS: scim-kmfl-imengine
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 05:31:20PM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> > And I will use the debconf question to offer to set im-switch to
> > scim-immodule if you think that would be acceptable.
>
> I have absolutely no problem with that. Im-switch setting, being a part
> of the alternative system, is always for system admin to change. And
> debconf question is a good way to do that.
Are you sure. If 2 packages play on one configuration file, then
depending on upgrade sequence, it may conflict.
Adding debconf question is good improvement but making
scim-kmfl-imengine to change scim setting via its debconf question is
bad idea.
Osamu
Reply to: