[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: drapes (updated)

On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:41:06PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On (25/09/06 01:48), Francesco Namuri wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > > If copyright has been asserted on the file then it must be mentioned in
> > > debian/rules, along with its distribution license. If there isn't one
> > > you should find out what it is and add it, or drop the file.
> > 
> > It's not my solution, :)
> > I have found it taking a look in the dpatch examples
> > (/usr/share/doc/dpatch/examples/dpatch/01_config.dpatch.gz).
> > considering that it is among the examples of dpatch, I have thought that
> > it is released under GPL, your opinion?
> If dpatch is under GPL then yes probably, but confirmation should be
> sought. You can also check the debian/copyright of dpatch, as it should
> be documented in there.
> James

I have seen that quite a lot packages use it (for example  grip),
without specifying the license in debian/copyright...


Francesco Namuri <francesco@namuri.it>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: