Re: RFS: python-goopy
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 04:44:24PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>
>>You're only supposed to have a single source package generating the
>>appropriate binary packages.
> Then I have done the right thing; I used the same sources to compile
> modules for python2.3 as well as python2.4.
You're not using a *single* source *package* to generate the binary
packages, though.
Note that "multiple binary packages" is territory difficult enough for
the NM guide to discourage for beginners. If you want to ignore that
advice (which is perfectly OK), you need to be looking at examples,
playing with dh_make, and/or reading the Debian Policy Manual and the
Developer's References to find out how multiple binary packages work.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
Reply to: