Re: RFS: python-goopy
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:16:27PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Hi, Kumar...
>
> Thanks for your contribution. Please allow me to comment on your
> package:
First, many thanks for the patient review.
> - the upstream tarball (orig.tar.gz) on your web server seems
> to be incomplete (just contains PKG-INFO and README). I downloaded
> the tarball from SourceForge.
Have corrected that.
> - the README.Debian is superfluous since it does not contain more
> information than already provided in debian/control. Please remove
> it.
Removed.
> - the debian/docs contains two files that are not very helpful for the
> user. The instructions on installing the package are in fact
> misleading.
I have edited it, and added a message saying Debian users have it
installed already.
> - please remove the parts of the debian/rules that you commented out
Done, to the best of my knowledge.
> - since the package is meant to be for "Architecture: all" you do not
> need everything you are running in the *-arch targets.
Done that.
> - since python2.4 is out you may consider creating a second binary
> package (hint: debian/control) python2.4-goopy
Done, though I didn't actually get your hint.
> - you do not have a build dependency on python. Building in a "pbuilder"
> failed here due to unsatisfied dependencies.
My builds now depend on python2.3 as well as python2.3-dev for the
python2.3 version.
Please do verify whether they adhere to the necessary standards. I
have uploaded them again to http://kumar.travisbsd.org/debpackages
Thanks again.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
Reply to: