Op do, 01-09-2005 te 13:12 -0700, schreef Steve Langasek: > > For future ref for anyone: > > > Yup, it's the BSD 3 clause licence, which is fine. > > The 4 clause isn't, as it has teh 'advertising' clause in it. > > Uh, no, 4 clause BSD *is* allowed in main. I also thought 4-clause BSD was non-free... I checked http://wiki.debian.net/?DFSGLicenses but the only time the 4-clause BSD licence is mentioned is in the comment on the 3-clause BSD Licence. No mention whether 4-clause is DSFG-free or not though. Maybe someone can make an update? (I don't think I know enough about licences and 4-clause BSD in particular to do an update myself) Greetings Arjan Oosting
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part