On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:13:41PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote: > Jason Tan wrote on 01/09/2005 08:22: > > We're on the BSD license only because torsmo, conky's predecessor, was > > BSD. When we do Conky 2.x, which will be a complete rewrite almost from > > scratch, it will be GPL 2. Let me know if you need any more information > > or fixes or whatnot, and I'll try to take care of them soon. Thanks. > > BSD license is perfectly OK to go into main. Packages like lilo, mailx, > mount, netpbm use it, too. For future ref for anyone: Yup, it's the BSD 3 clause licence, which is fine. The 4 clause isn't, as it has teh 'advertising' clause in it. Regards, Neil -- __ .Ž `. neilm@debian.org | Application Manager : :' ! ---------------- | Secure-Testing Team member `. `Ž gpg: B345BDD3 | Webapps Team member `- Please don't cc, I'm subscribed to the list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature