[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: fig2sxd


Alexander Bürger wrote:
> Thanks. Now revision 3 is on sf.
> I must admit that I skipped the NMU chapter. But still I do not find such
> a statement that dots in debian revision are reserved. Chapter of
> the developers-reference says "should add a new minor version number".
> Does this imply that a minor version number may not exist before?

When the previous version was a Maintainer upload, yes.

-2 -> NMU is -2.1

-2.1 (previous NMU) -> next NMU is -2.2

Anyhow, besides the fact I don't like your changelog entry for -2.1
 ( *" Fix packaging problem" - which? I know, but changelog is
   for documenting the actual changes....)
i'll see over this, the package otherwise is ok and uploaded.
Please write better changelog entries next time, though...


 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: