[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: foobillard package



Frank Gevaerts <frank@gevaerts.be> writes:

> I'm trying to package foobillard (http://foobillard.sunsite.dk/) for
> debian.

Looks nice.

>   a foobillard goes to non-free, which would be a pity.

And people who have ttf-larabie-* installed will have some fonts
double, which is also bad.

>   b The fonts are removed from the package, which gets foobillard to
>     contrib, but with dependencies on ttf-larabie-straight and
>     ttf-larabie-deco, both over 3 MB and 7 MB installed. This means one
>     needs 17 MB diskspace instead of 1.3 MB

Maybe Erich Schubert is willing to split out the fonts you need in one
or two separate packages? Have you asked him?

>   c The fonts are replaced by free fonts. The upstream author would
>     prefer not to do this, so this would be a debian-specific change.
>     Also, it is not easy to find good-looking free decorative fonts.

I don't think the game would lose its soul even with plain sans-serif
fonts (judging from the screenshots).

>   d solution (c), but use the original non-free fonts if they happen to
>     be installed (maybe with a Suggests:). This would require some work.
> 
> What would be the best solution here ?

(d) is good but the most work. (c) is also quite acceptible. Of course
there's always the best <eg>:

(e) Convince Ray Larabie to use a free license. Maybe hu is content to
release under a must-rename-derivatives condition. But consult with
Erich and debian-legal first if you want to persue this. (Least
programming work, but may strain social muscles.)

> Unfortunately, I do not know much about *roff.

It's not that hard to pick up the few things you need from
groff_man(7) (kudos to Susan Kleinmann).

-- 
Robbe

Attachment: signature.ng
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: