Re: Missing files in /etc
fredagen den 10 januari 2003 20.06 skrev Stephen Gran:
> I've seen this behavior occasionally on some of my boxes, and I wonder
> if the problem is that the newer version of a pckage has a conffile that
> the older version doesn't have. Hmmm . . not very clear. Like this:
>
> package-foo_1.2 conffiles: file1
> file2
>
> package-foo_2.0 conffiles: file1
> file2
> file3
>
> Does dpkg interpret the (missing) state of file3 as appropriate? I
> haven't had the chance to investigate. I would think that the intended
> behavior is no, but I've seen this come up on various lists and here, so
> I wonder.
I just got a report of a file in etc missing in one of my packages. It was a
mistake, and I put it in. Installing it, replacing the old package, installed
the file, so I think that answers that question. If a new file comes as a
conffile, that was not in the previous version of the same package, it gets
installed.
Still I don't understand the circumstances for which a file is not installed,
when upgrading. It should not happen, but it does occasionally.
The new KDE, when it goes to SID, will have a potential to get this error
since it has a very essential file in /etc. Let's see if anyone will get this
problem when upgrading. If not, it is a very rare thing.
Karolina
Reply to: