Splitting man pages
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Splitting man pages
- From: blacksheep <blacksheep@lulli.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:55:38 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20031218175538.GA1538@purple>
- In-reply-to: <20031110175820.GB943@purple>
- References: <1068117074.9251.397.camel@zen8100a> <20031106150316.GC2075@triplehelix.org> <20031106190233.GA2816@purple> <20031107194837.GF2075@triplehelix.org> <20031110175820.GB943@purple>
Hallo folks!
I had to wrote a lot of man pages for a multiple-binary package.
They have to include all the same portion of text for full explanation.
A first solution I found was to provide an additional troff document
which any man page would include as follows:
.so additional.1
But lintian shout out something like:
WHAT IS THAT FOR ? You should not provide a mapage with no corresponding binary !
For me it is _very_ important to provide such informations in a separate
file, as further modifications will reflect on any page, without the need
for editing each one by hand.
My advocate suggested a different solution; is it legal to write something
like:
.so /usr/share/<package-name>/additional.1
in a man page ? What solution would be cleaner to adopt ?
Thanks in advance,
Paolo aka 'blacksheep'
--
<!--_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Home Page: www.lulli.net
email: paolo@lulli.net
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-->
Reply to: