On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 06:55:38PM +0100, blacksheep wrote: > .so additional.1 > > But lintian shout out something like: > > WHAT IS THAT FOR ? You should not provide a mapage with no corresponding binary ! That would be bad if some package someday provides a /usr/bin/additional. > My advocate suggested a different solution; is it legal to write something > like: > > .so /usr/share/<package-name>/additional.1 > > in a man page ? What solution would be cleaner to adopt ? Sure, why not? but maybe the section 1 isn't needed... -- Joshua Kwan
Attachment:
pgpxOSfWzdAmM.pgp
Description: PGP signature