Re: neglected RC bugs
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
Two, I find it very encouraging to see that there are so few "neglected"
bugs. A few of these bugs stem from known issues like the ruby 1.6->1.8
transition; i. e., the lack of follow-ups on a particular bug is
misleading, because it's mostly there as a reminder or to block
propagation into sarge. Almost all of the rest are on packages that I can
The list is short, but I don't consider it to be complete. Several
cases which aren't covered, such as when someone other than the
maintainer confirms the bug or provides more info, or where there has
been a dialog between the maintainer and reporter with the ball left in
the maintainer's hands.
http:// if ile.o g/