Re: j2sdk build-depends cannot be satisfied?
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
> > java-common. Is this still appropriate, even though I know that not
> > every package that provides java-common will work with my package?
Hi
java-common is NOT a virtual package. You are probably referring
to java-virtual-machine and java-runtime. So no package provies
java-common, and if they do that is a severe bug.
> You should list the working package first :
>
> working-java | java-common
And it should look like this instead.
working-jvm | java-virtual-machine.
> This way, the autobuilders will pick the first option first.
And in the case of java2-runtime we have a big problem becuase
there is not any such thing that the build daemons can handle...
If someone knows a solution to it I'll happily use it on libfop-java
and other packages.
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: