[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: prinseq(-lite), a dependency of virus seeker



merkys@debian.org, on 2020-04-12 07:44:10 +0300:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On 2020-04-11 19:37, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > When following the Debian Med scheme to make the autopkgtest user
> > runnable you need to install the example data into the binary package
> > as example.
> 
> Is this necessary? Autopkgtest runner always has the source package at
> hand (actually, it is executed inside the source tree), thus one could
> simply use 'example/' directory from there. Or is there any gotcha?
> Supplying autopkgtest data in binary packages introduces unnecessarily
> bloat.

For what it's worth, the example data adds 808K in the user's
system.  The package with example data weights 392K, thanks to
compression.  Without example data this drops to a .deb
weighting 44K; that represents one order of magnitude.

Would it be worth putting example data in a side package, say
for instance "prinseq-lite-example" ?  Genuine testing is not
yet in place anyway.

Kind Regards,
-- 
Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org>
Fingerprint:  5ab1 4edf 63bb ccff 8b54  2fa9 59da 56fe fff3 882d
Help find cures against the Covid-19 !  Give CPU cycles:
  * Rosetta@home: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/
  * Folding@home: https://foldingathome.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: