[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [MoM] simka package status and bedops



Hi again,

Looking at the mailing list I see you wrote to me on the 16th but
mysteriously never got the email - sorry.

Thanks,
Shayan Doust

On 18/09/2019 21:31, Shayan Doust wrote:
> Hello Andreas,
> 
> Thanks for the heads-up. I will use the sed alternative in the future.
> 
> Inspecting the autopep8 output I do not see any red flags. Also, the
> autopkgtest runs successfully so that should be a more concrete basis of
> success.
> 
>> Moreover currently I think the more valuable task is bug #905206 of
>> profnet.  Will you be able to have a look at this (in case you are
>> comfortable with gdb a bit)?
> 
> I will make this my next task to look at.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Shayan Doust
> 
> On 18/09/2019 19:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi Shayan,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 07:15:13PM +0100, Shayan Doust wrote:
>>> In the meantime while I find a solution for FAST, I believe metastudents
>>> patch-work is complete (autopep8 used again because upstream tabbing /
>>> spacing).
>>
>> Meanwhile I have meanwhile learned that autopep8 can really do dangerous
>> things like reordering imports:
>>
>>     https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/09/msg00086.html
>>
>> It really left non-functional code behind.  So for me personally this
>> program is on a black list and I rather use
>>
>>     sed -P -i 's/\t/        /g' *.py
>>
>> to fix spacing.  Can you confirm that your autopep8 call just fixed
>> spacings and did not do anything else what might be potentially harmful?
>>  
>> Moreover currently I think the more valuable task is bug #905206 of
>> profnet.  Will you be able to have a look at this (in case you are
>> comfortable with gdb a bit)?
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>      Andreas.
>>
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: