Re: Bio-Linux vs Debian-Med package lists [update]
On 11/03/18 13:28, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> it would be nice if you could add some clarifying comments to some
> question marks I added to the list. Meanwhile I ITPed and uploaded the
> missing R packages - at least those than can be packaged for licensing
> reasons. If I do not hear from you I will soon remove those packages
> from the list that are obvious false positives.
Hi, Andreas.
I compared the Bio-Linux 'master' list of packages added to Ubuntu in
the Bio-Linux .iso with your Debian-Med/Bio* tasks. The false positives
appear to be packages installed from the main Ubuntu/Debian repositories
and are not part of your Debian-Med/Bio* tasks e.g. bioperl-run:
> ajt@beluga:~$ apt-cache policy bioperl-run
> bioperl-run:
> Installed: 1.6.9-2
> Candidate: 1.6.9-2
> Version table:
> *** 1.6.9-2 0
> 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/universe amd64 Packages
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
I'll check your '???' comments and report back here.
Bye,
Tony.
--
Minke Informatics Limited, Registered in Scotland - Company No. SC419028
Registered Office: 3 Donview, Bridge of Alford, AB33 8QJ, Scotland (UK)
tel. +44(0)19755 63548 http://minke-informatics.co.uk
mob. +44(0)7985 078324 mailto:tony.travis@minke-informatics.co.uk
Reply to: