[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bio-Linux vs Debian-Med package lists [update]

Hi Tony,

it would be nice if you could add some clarifying comments to some
question marks I added to the list.  Meanwhile I ITPed and uploaded the
missing R packages - at least those than can be packaged for licensing
reasons.  If I do not hear from you I will soon remove those packages
from the list that are obvious false positives.

Kind regards


On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:10:14PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> thanks for the comparison.
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 07:21:20PM +0100, Tony Travis wrote:
> > Re: Our discussion at the 2018 Debian-Med Sprint in Barcelona.
> > 
> > I've compared our Bio-Linux 'master' package list used to create the
> > 'live/install' USB stick with your "med-bio*" list of 'Recommends:'.
> > 
> > Updated to remove ',' from the end of "med-bio*" package names and the
> > "bio-linux-" prefix from the Bio-Linux 'master' package list.
> I was working down your list and have pushed it into a newly created
> repository here:
>      https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/community/bio-linux/blob/master/debian-med_missings.txt
> Non-biological software was striped of, packages only in Debian were
> also stripped.  The diff contained several false positives which are
> marked by "??? in Debian" - may be Tony can clarify why he thinks
> these were marked missing.
> Real missings got helpful links and comments added.  Please work
> down this todo list, package what is possible and add the repository
> containing your packaging effort.
> Everybody is welcome to add further remarks to the list - most
> preferably adding links to the repository where the packaging is
> started.  So feel free to
>      git clone git@salsa.debian.org:med-team/community/bio-linux.git
> and help making Bio-Linux a real subset of Debian.
> Kind regards
>       Andreas.
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: