Re: test mismatches expected output in signalp 4.1c
Hello,
I didn't get any response to this message of mine from last May. There
are two points there: one is the output of the test suite and the other
is the request to consider less restrictive licensing.
Thanks and regards
Afif
على الخميس 5 أيار 2016 15:25، كتب Afif Elghraoui:
> Hello,
> I ran the tests on my copy of signalp 4.1c and the output does not
> exactly match the expected output for two cases. I'm not sure whether
> the differences are significant, but here are the results from my test
> run anyway:
>
> afif@saam:~/sysadmin/alborz/apps/signalp$ make -k -f debian/tests/Makefile
> signalp -t euk -f short test/euk10.fsa | diff -u test/euk10.fsa.short_out -
> signalp -t euk -f long test/euk10.fsa | diff -u test/euk10.fsa.long_out -
> --- test/euk10.fsa.long_out 2013-01-04 03:27:22.000000000 -0800
> +++ - 2016-05-05 15:07:26.697420248 -0700
> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@
> 45 D 0.110 0.113 0.270
> 46 Y 0.098 0.115 0.251
> 47 E 0.100 0.116 0.250
> - 48 D 0.100 0.111 0.244
> + 48 D 0.101 0.111 0.244
> 49 Y 0.106 0.117 0.244
> 50 A 0.099 0.112 0.228
> 51 S 0.096 0.111 0.218
> debian/tests/Makefile:8: recipe for target 'euk10.fsa.long_out' failed
> make: *** [euk10.fsa.long_out] Error 1
> signalp -t euk -f all test/euk10.fsa | diff -u test/euk10.fsa.all_out -
> --- test/euk10.fsa.all_out 2013-01-04 03:23:57.000000000 -0800
> +++ - 2016-05-05 15:07:27.307406112 -0700
> @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@
> 45 D 0.110 0.113 0.109 0.113 0.109
> 46 Y 0.098 0.115 0.100 0.119 0.109
> 47 E 0.100 0.116 0.101 0.120 0.111
> -48 D 0.100 0.111 0.103 0.114 0.112
> +48 D 0.101 0.111 0.103 0.114 0.112
> 49 Y 0.106 0.117 0.105 0.116 0.114
> 50 A 0.099 0.112 0.101 0.116 0.114
> 51 S 0.096 0.111 0.099 0.115 0.112
> debian/tests/Makefile:8: recipe for target 'euk10.fsa.all_out' failed
> make: *** [euk10.fsa.all_out] Error 1
> signalp -t euk -f summary test/euk10.fsa | diff -u
> test/euk10.fsa.summary_out -
>
>
> My operating system is Debian 8. Do you think this discrepancy would
> cause any problems? Also, I was wondering whether you would consider
> less restrictive licensing. That would allow for redistribution in
> platforms like Debian and give your program greater exposure to users
> and contributors.
>
> Many thanks and regards
> Afif
>
Reply to: