On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:57:15PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 19-01-16 11:28, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:50:43PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >>> If you ask me we can deal with this without bothering the release team
> >>> who might save their time for more important stuff. Anybody who
> >>> disagrees is free to strictly follow the Transition wiki literally and
> >>> blame me for failing to follow the rules.
> >>
> >> The added value of Release Team involvement is that they can help
> >> migration to testing by (partially) removing packages that haven't been
> >> updated yet, and can configure hints to help migrate the packages to
> >> testing. This may not be required for this transition.
> >
> > Since the important (as you said in your mail even serious) bugs are now
> > resolved according to
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=libquazip5-dev;users=sebastic@debian.org
> > I do not see any further need to bother release team about this. Do you
> > agree?
>
> I agree. As Mattia said, only marble is left and the maintainer said
> he'd update it soon, so we should be good.
So, today I pinged the marble maintainer again, and he told me he's
working on the new upstream release, that it would have gone to
experimental through NEW, so totally useless for this case. He acked a
0-day NMU though, so I just uploaded it. If everything goes well, in 5
days libquazip should be good to go into stretch, then.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature