Hi Andreas, Le 15/01/2016 16:27, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 04:06:49PM +0100, Julien Lamy wrote: >> >>> I spended a bit more time in thinking about this. IMHO it makes sense >>> to make the rename perfect by also renaming the Git repository. If we >>> might stick to the old name that could become confusing in the future. >> >> That was my next point, once the package issues were sorted out. I agree >> with renaming the repo, it will simplify things in the future. Is a >> simple "mv dcmtkpp.git odil.git" on git.debian.org sufficient (provided >> debian/control is up-to-date)? > > I just did the necessary stuff. You also need to should edit the config > file in the bare git repository at git.debian.org to have consistent > commit messages. Please point your local clone to > > ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/odil.git I updated description, and you had already taken care of config. >>> Another reason is that there is no single package depending from the old >>> names so in practice we are not really doing a transition but in fact it >>> is a simple rename. >> >> Yes, I might have gone over the top considering the early age of the >> package. Should I remove the old packages from the current >> debian/control? > > Yes. Done. >> If so, how is the removal of the old packages from the >> unstable archive performed? > > You file a bug > > reportbug other > > select ftpmaster and ask for removal. Its probably sensible to mention > that the new package is just a rename to have good chances that it passes > new quickly. You can also ask for the removal of dcmtk++ *after* odil > was accepted. It seems more logical to me to ask for removal after the upload of the new package: is there any reason to prefer one to the other? > >>> The only thing what you need to do is to add >>> >>> Conflicts / Provides >>> >>> fields also for the old names to make sure the packages will really >>> replace the possibly installed old named packages. >> >> Even if the old packages are removed from debian/control? > > Yes. To make sure that a user who has the old packages installed will > deinstall these. Done. Should I also add a Replace field? -- Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature