Re: Thanks to Gert and Sascha - other please keep on fixing bugs (Was: Thanks to Sascha for his bug fixing - but we should do more (Was: Strengthening team by fixing other members bugs))
Hi Kevin,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:15:12PM +1000, Kevin Murray wrote:
>
> Andreas/Michael may remember differently, but from memory we will have:
>
> - SeqAn 1.x in src:seqan -> seqan-dev (only, no apps)
> - SeqAn 2.x in src:seqan2 -> libseqan2-dev and seqan-apps (and one day -doc)
Ahhh, this somehow shades light in my weak memory. Makes sense and if we
are lucky the gcc-6 issue does not affect the seqan(1)-dev part.
> So yes, I agree with you. Seqan 1.x (i.e. src:seqan) should be made to build
> correctly and not get booted from testing (and git should be reverted such that
> it contains only 1.x). Especially while the likes of bowtie & tophat rely upon
> them. (Though for smaller tools, providing patches to get them to build with
> seqan 2.x shouldn't be monumentally difficult and should be qulte
> upstream-able).
ACK for the plan in general. What about the sequence for realisation.
Should we may be try to reate libseqan1-dev (and droping seqan1-apps)
soon? When writing it: Should we may be keep the name seqan for
version 2 and specify the number one only on the old version?
Thanks for your insight.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: