Re: Updating the fis-gtm package to V6.2-000
Hi Amul,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:41:34AM -0400, Amul Shah wrote:
> > W: fis-gtm-6.2-000: debian-changelog-line-too-long line 6
> >
> >(git pull) - please note that the target distribution should be
> >"UNRELEASED" until we will release.
>
> [amul:1] Whoops! Thanks for catching that.
:-)
> >I also wonder whether you could forward the "spelling-error-in-binary"
> >type lintian infos to upstream.
>
> [amul:1] I didn't see this lintian message. That said, cleaning
> things up in the upstream is preferable. The fewer exceptions the
> better.
You need to call
lintian -I
to get these.
> >>While looking at the installed directory, I noticed two inconsistencies marked as (todo) in the changelog. Both entries are related to the encryption plugins. We build only one plugin (using libgcrypt and AES256CFB) and the "plugin" directory is a symlink in the utf8 directory (which IIRC does not match what our install script produces).
> >So do you plan to fix this before I'll upload? Please tell me once you
> >are happy with the package since I personally know to less about fis-gtm
> >to know whether these todos are blocking issues or not.
>
> [amul:1] I would like to fix the build to generate all of the
> encryption plugins, but I don't think that should hold up the
> release of the V6.2-000.
OK, just tell me once you consider this done.
> [amul:1] The "plugin" directory as a symlink is only a problem when
> using an encrypted database with V6.1-000 and UTF-8. Since we have
> V6.2-000 almost ready, I don't know if it is worth the time to fix
> that bug in V6.1-000 package. I'll remove the TODO from the
> changelog later this evening.
+1 for concentrating on V6.2
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: