Re: Updating the fis-gtm package to V6.2-000
Hi Amul,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:25:22AM -0400, Amul Shah wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> Thanks to your prior instructions and V6.2-000 changes eliminating the patch series, going through this round was a quite quick.
:-)
> I added two lintian warnings overrides. Please let me know if they are correct.
Lintian was able to use the crated overrides - so this is obviously fine.
I just fixed
W: fis-gtm-6.2-000: debian-changelog-line-too-long line 6
(git pull) - please note that the target distribution should be
"UNRELEASED" until we will release.
I also wonder whether you could forward the "spelling-error-in-binary"
type lintian infos to upstream.
> While looking at the installed directory, I noticed two inconsistencies marked as (todo) in the changelog. Both entries are related to the encryption plugins. We build only one plugin (using libgcrypt and AES256CFB) and the "plugin" directory is a symlink in the utf8 directory (which IIRC does not match what our install script produces).
So do you plan to fix this before I'll upload? Please tell me once you
are happy with the package since I personally know to less about fis-gtm
to know whether these todos are blocking issues or not.
> On a loosely related note, I learned how to avoid signing the packages without my GPG key (http://notes.timeghost.net/2009/12/build-a-binary-deb-package-without-signing.html). You may recall this was my stumbling block for V6.0-003.
> git-buildpackage --git-builder="debuild -i -us -uc"
Yup - I should have mentioned this, sorry.
Kind regards and thanks for your work on this
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: