Nelson wrote a short while ago:
There is only one detail: the upstream patch is wrong. It was diffed
wrongly ("diff new old" instead "diff old new").
You can verify by diffing the old tarball against the new one and
comparing to http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~arun/mustang/
patch_15Jan2008.mustang
The description on the web page is wrong. And I was wrong in saying that I used the old tarball. In fact I am using the "new tarball" md5: 883bd27b7ce9681476008089e769aa50. However, it does _not_ contain the patches in the file "patch_15Jan2008.mustang", but it _does_ contain some changes relative to the older tarball. The manpage I contributed is one thing I remember.
The patch file applies without problems to tarball 883bd...etc... so that is the one we should build against. I simply wrapped the patchfile "patch_15Jan2008.mustang" with a dpatch header and called it 01-upstream.dpatch.
It really is confusing when upstream authors don't use a sensible versioning! :-/
Anyhow, I hope this clarifies things. I'm kinda fading for tonight, I hope there aren't more things I've forgotten!
Cheers, Morten