Re: Re: LinuDent and tk_fp and odontolinux
> WHY DON'T WE PLAN A NEW DATABASE STRUCTURE that can be able to
> manage every medical practice?
OK. Why don't we look at other project's database structure
first and discuss their advantages and disadvantages ?
There is a whole bunch of them, most notably GNUmed.
> It can have one or two «configure» tables in which you can store
> informations like:
>
> 1) Practice. (dentistry, oculists, dermatologist, general pratictioner
> and so on)
> 2) doctor's name/s
"Doctor" and "Patient" are just roles of "people" so they
really should be in the same name/address table.
> 3) invoice header
> 4) practice's address, telephone, fax, ecc.
> 5) Treatments amount.
>
> The other tables could be like (we should discuss a lot about it)
> odontolinux's ones:
>
> patient general data
> treatment plan
> Ledger
> Payments/Invoices
Take a look at GNUmed - some of your suggestions are there
already. I have had a look at OpenKaart and EpSys tables. They
don't come up to par. I just downloaded TkFP (47 MB ...) to
have a look there. I will look at odontolinux and linudent.
(In all fairness I should say that I am biased - I am
currently a GNUMed co-developer.)
> So we could call it the (Debian) Medical Practice Management Suite.
Please, let's not start another suite.
Regards,
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: