[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity (and missing DLAs on www.do)



Hi,

According to https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development#Claim_a_DLA_ID_in_DLA.2Flist
one reserves the DLA number right /after/ the upload, with a dated entry in data/DLA/list, so it's meant to be used quickly.

That being said, I modified the script to not only s/committer/package/, but also print the DLA date.
(I scrapped a version where I filtered out the current date's DLAs, because I'm not sure who else uses the script and what they expect).

Cheers!
Sylvain

On 18/08/2020 13:46, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi

One thing to consider when implementing a delay. You typically reserve the DLA some time before making the update so the time you select will most likely be wrong.
Based on this I tend to agree with Holger that any time you select will not be suitable. :-)

But sure some delay may be ok.

// Ola

On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 00:08, Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> wrote:
hi Sylvain,

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:45:03PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > - DLA 2332-1 (reserved by Sylvain Beucler)
> I just uploaded it, I am waiting for the ftp confirmation mail, I didn't
> even send it by e-mail yet - don't harass me!! ;)
>
> More seriously, we could add a delay.

I believe that wouldn't change anything. If the script would only
complain about DLA reservations X hours old, of course $you would send
the DLA right after my mail / after X hours + 2 minutes.

p.s.: as an after thought re: "don't harass me" (though I get it was a
joke, but I think the joke conveyed a useful notion): maybe my semiautomatic
mails should have a permanent disclaimer that being 'called out' by them is
nothing bad and doesn't deserve any explaination, just fixing? I've just took
a note to do so next monday, please help me to word this disclaimer nicely.

> Also, I remember we added the uploader name to make it easier for
> everybody to notice what needs to be fixed, but for roughly the same
> informational value it may be nicer to mention the package name instead.

that seriously would be a good improvement! patches welcome! ;-D

> What script is responsible for this?

find-missing-advisories in debian-webwml.git, to be used like this:

cd ~/Projects/security-tracker
git pull
cd ~/Projects/debian-www/webwml
git pull
./english/security/find-missing-advisories --mode DLA --tracker ../../security-tracker/ 2>&1

(while having these git repos cloned into those paths...)

Reply to: