On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 19:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 18:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > As I understand it, packages are never moved directly from oldstable- > > security to archive.debian.org. Normally they are copied to oldstable > > in a final point release, and then moved to archive.debian.org. In > > this case, there was a point release on 2nd April and none at the > > transition to LTS. > > > > This is fine for the LTS architectures since wheezy-security still > > exists on security.debian.org. But it seems no-one thought through > > how the other architectures' recent security uploads would get > > archived. And since all wheezy LTS uploads are also going into wheezy- > > security, I think we're going to have the same issue at the end of LTS. > > > > So I think there needs to be some kind of pseudo-point-release for > > wheezy to straighten out the non-LTS architectures now, and another one > > at the end of LTS.. > There'll be an actual point release for wheezy, as an EOL clean-up as > usual. Thanks. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part