Re: prevent a package to be installed
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 06:35:09PM +0200, chals wrote:
> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:35:09 +0200
> From: chals <chals@chalsattack.com>
> To: Debian-live mailing list <debian-live@lists.debian.org>
> Cc: Gerard ROBIN <g.robin3@free.fr>
> Subject: Re: prevent a package to be installed
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:28 PM, chals <chals@chalsattack.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Gerard ROBIN <g.robin3@free.fr> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 08:08:47PM +0200, chals wrote:
> >>> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 20:08:47 +0200
> >>> From: chals <chals@chalsattack.com>
> >
> >> On the other hand after the boot time I am well in console, but when I hit
> >> the login and the password, I don't stay in the console, xwindow starts automaticaly.
> >> This is not what I want and remove lightdm have no use to me. I don't understand
> >> why xwindow start automatically.
> >>
> >
> > This is probably due to the autologin. You can try to disable it by
> > using the appropriate live-config option. See live-config man page:
> >
>
> Thinking it twice, these are probably unrelated topics. I mean,
> "nox11autologin" prevents the live user's graphical session to start
> automatically but it does not necessarily stop the xserver from
> starting. So...
>
> while the "noautologin" options work fine, they will not help you in
> your plans to prevent the graphical display to start automatically...
>
> I hope that preventing the installation of lightdm and the gtk greeter
> (using negative apt pinning) help you achieve what you want to do.
> Probably doing some research on why/how the xwindow system starts
> would help too.
I tried noautologin, nottyautologin, nox11autologin but none gives the
desired result. I use:
--bootappend-live "boot-live config=noautologin ....."
Perhaps this is not the right syntax ?
this is the problem: how start x11 with live-build.
On my jessie laptop I removed lightdm and after the boot time I am in console
and startx starts x11 (xfce4 for me)
For nano apt-get purge nano works fine (with the persistence) but I
think I use more memory by removing nano that to keep it, so I keep it.
--
Gerard
___________________________________________
*******************************************
* Created with "mutt 1.5.23" *
* under Debian Linux JESSIE version 8.1 *
* Registered Linux User #388243 *
* https://Linuxcounter.net *
*******************************************
Reply to: