Re: On-the-fly module inserting and removing
T o n g wrote:
>> it should go into live-initramfs. i though this was implicit clear.
well, it depends on what the timeframe is. if you can show that it's
working and the code is acceptable, and a proper patch against
live-initramfs is made, then it can go in there now.
> Although the current script depends on live-initramfs, IMHO, the
> better approach is to spin out a common library into a separate package.
...otherwise it has to wait until the live-initramfs/live-initscripts
split happens after lenny. which means optimistically something like
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist