Re: yet another patch
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:39:14PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> > Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
>> > writes:
>> >> I'm not sure this check is worth including. I find even the
>> >> aesthetical impact vey low.
>> >
>> > Yeah, I don't think it would do anything beyond just annoy people;
>> > there's
>> > no actual problem here. It's just enforcing a coding style, which is a
>> > largely arbitrary choice. If we had an infrastructure for doing coding
>> > style tests (there are a few other bugs marked [aesthetic] in a similar
>> > situation), it could maybe be rolled into that.
>> >
>>
>> I don't see the point of having Ubuntu-like version strings, especially
>> if we currently have *none* in the archive.
>
> Which all in all is not a very good argument for your case ;)
Well, the ones with that style of version strings in -mentors scare me and
other folks reviewing them :-/.
>
> Gruesse,
Cheers,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Reply to: