Re: Vim's user manual bug closed: reopen?
MJ Ray <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Francesco Poli <email@example.com>
> > I noticed that bug #384019 has been recently closed. [...]
> > The bug was closed because an FTP-master (James Troup) stated that the
> > Open Publication License v1.0 without options is fine for main. [...]
> > What should be done, in your opinion?
> > Should the bug be reopened?
> No. I think the outer-surfaces problem is just an obnoxious advertising
> clause, it seems unlikely that this particular licensor will try
> to enforce 'identified' in a bad way and upstream tracking is OK.
I am confused as to whether the licensor will allow anonymous changes.
On the one hand, he says
At the same time I think anonymous changes to code or docs should
indeed be disallowed.
but on the other, he says
The solution is to use a fantasy name for the author.