Re: (DRAFT 2) FAQ on documentation licensing

[Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>]

glenn@zewt.org wrote:

>It's an example of how no consistent distinction between documentation and
>programs can be drawn: the source *is* the documentation.  I think it's a
Wrong. When using doxygen and similar programs, source and documentation
are in the same file but they are not the same bits.

>clear demonstration of how it's impossible to meaningfully hold programs and
>documentation to different standards of freedom.
Impossibile? I just did it. Works fine.

-- 
ciao,
Marco