Re: (DRAFT 2) FAQ on documentation licensing
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 07:45:26PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> Also, doxygen, for generating standalone documentation from inline docs.
> I think this is a critical example, since it's specific, and a lot of
> people actually use it (google for it to see just how many).
This is basically the same example as javadoc. It would probably work
to say "javadoc or doxygen", but I'm not sure how long that list should
grow.
Personally, I don't think it's a particularly compelling example because
it's a way of extracting documentation from a program and we're trying
to describe the opposite direction. But I guess I don't really object
to it either.
--
Raul
Reply to: