Re: IRAF component relicensed

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: IRAF component relicensed
From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:36:31 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20041219173631.O22958@links.magenta.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] yw1xmzw93oro.fsf@ford.inprovide.com>; from mru@inprovide.com on Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:29:47PM +0100
References: <[🔎] 20041219174537.GA22177@andromeda> <[🔎] 20041219200614.GB22177@andromeda> <[🔎] 20041219204540.GA27403@andromeda> <[🔎] 20041219170950.N22958@links.magenta.com> <[🔎] yw1xmzw93oro.fsf@ford.inprovide.com>

On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:29:47PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> And this is probably the reason we have thousands of (probably
> invalid) software patents instead.

Copyright law is only a minor part of that issue.

-- 
Raul

Reply to:

References:
- IRAF component relicensed
  - From: Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>
- Re: IRAF component relicensed
  - From: Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>
- Re: IRAF component relicensed
  - From: Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>
- Re: IRAF component relicensed
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
- Re: IRAF component relicensed
  - From: Måns Rullgård <mru@inprovide.com>

Prev by Date: Re: IRAF component relicensed
Next by Date: Re: Is the xdebug's non-free license necessary?
Previous by thread: Re: IRAF component relicensed
Next by thread: Re: IRAF component relicensed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread