GFDL
If the whole docu would be DFSG-free, than there would be no cause to
remove polical statements.
According to Don Armstrong, a non-modifiable text cannot under any
circumstances be considered DFSG-free, so it would have to be removed
from the manual. Others have (it appears) said the same thing.
Having seen a lot of rigid dogmatism here recently, I can hardly
expect Debian not to be rigidly dogmatic on this issue too.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GFDL
- From: Jan Schumacher <uzs5p3@uni-bonn.de>
- Re: GFDL
- From: bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)
- Re: GFDL
- From: Andreas Barth <aba+nospam@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: GFDL
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)