[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Suing for hot coffee [Was: Re: UnrealIRCd License (Click-Through issue)]

* Don Armstrong (don@donarmstrong.com) [030920 21:50]:
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Joe Drew wrote:
> > Contrary to popular belief, the McDonald's coffee case was not
> > frivolous.
> > 
> > http://www.centerjd.org/free/mythbusters-free/MB_mcdonalds.htm

> First off, hot coffee causes 2nd degree burns, not 3rd degree
> burns.[1]

> 1: Assuming that you're not going swiming in the stuff, of course.

In this case she did "swim" in it, see also
http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm (which describes that case IMHO
much better).

No, it's not "indicative of larger judgements".

   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to: