On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 09:46:23PM +0000, Dylan Thurston wrote: > I find it strange that this issue continue to comes up on > debian-legal, which is clearly not the place to discuss changing the > DFSG, or deciding which bits on the CDs the DFSG should apply to. I don't. It's far easier to bellyache, and leave unchallenged one's own presumption that Debian should ship any sort of w4r3z in main as long as it isn't a "program" is one's own vague conception, than it is to come up with a coherent and closely-reasoned statement of project policy. -- G. Branden Robinson | Men are born ignorant, not stupid. Debian GNU/Linux | They are made stupid by education. branden@debian.org | -- Bertrand Russell http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpwD9ohaFJEc.pgp
Description: PGP signature