[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal

* Mathieu Roy (yeupou@gnu.org) [030912 10:20]:
> Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> a tapoté :
> > * Richard Stallman (rms@gnu.org) [030912 02:20]:
> > > I considered this possibility in the 1980s, not as an option but
> > > rather as a potential problem.  So I developed a method to make sure
> > > this would not happen: invariant sections.  The danger has not gone
> > > away, so we still need invariant sections.
> > 
> > That's really "end of discussion". If this clear wordings stands also
> > for the FSF, than there is nothing how the manuals can become free.

> [become free _SOFTWARE_]

become free in the sense of Debian. And that means: free according to
the DFSG. (I'm always speaking about Debian on *@lists.debian.org,
except noted otherwise. About what freedom should I speak here else?)

   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to: