Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Andreas Barth <firstname.lastname@example.org> a tapoté :
> * Mathieu Roy (email@example.com) [030912 10:20]:
> > Andreas Barth <firstname.lastname@example.org> a tapoté :
> > > * Richard Stallman (email@example.com) [030912 02:20]:
> > > > I considered this possibility in the 1980s, not as an option but
> > > > rather as a potential problem. So I developed a method to make sure
> > > > this would not happen: invariant sections. The danger has not gone
> > > > away, so we still need invariant sections.
> > >
> > > That's really "end of discussion". If this clear wordings stands also
> > > for the FSF, than there is nothing how the manuals can become free.
> > [become free _SOFTWARE_]
> become free in the sense of Debian. And that means: free according to
> the DFSG.
Hum, you mean in the sense of the Debian Free _SOFTWARE_ Guidelines?
Not a native english speaker: