Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Andreas Barth <firstname.lastname@example.org> a tapoté :
> * Richard Stallman (email@example.com) [030912 02:20]:
> > I considered this possibility in the 1980s, not as an option but
> > rather as a potential problem. So I developed a method to make sure
> > this would not happen: invariant sections. The danger has not gone
> > away, so we still need invariant sections.
> That's really "end of discussion". If this clear wordings stands also
> for the FSF, than there is nothing how the manuals can become free.
[become free _SOFTWARE_]
Not a native english speaker: