Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
* Mathieu Roy (firstname.lastname@example.org) [030911 10:20]:
> Anthony DeRobertis <email@example.com> a tapoté :
> > On Tuesday, Sep 9, 2003, at 12:29 US/Eastern, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > > So a country were you are free to kill a girl without any legal risk
> > > is a country DFSG compliant?
> > Please cite the specific paragraph of the DFSG that has _anything_ to
> > do with killing people.
> None. Because DFSG is about free _software_. Not about any freedom you
> can imagine.
Why do you than say something about killing people here? If we use the
word "free" or "freedom" here, we usually speak about "free(dom) in
the sense of the DFSG". (That's called context. In my referenced mail
I even said explicit what I mean by the words "free" and "non-free",
as I defined them, in the hope that even you won't missunderstand them.)
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C