Re: A possible GFDL compromise
* Anthony DeRobertis (asd@suespammers.org) [030911 01:50]:
> On Monday, Sep 8, 2003, at 18:06 US/Eastern, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >The (intended) GFDL, on the other hand, explicitly prohibits us from
> >distributing on certain things.
> No, it doesn't. It explicitly prohibits us from using technical
> measures to keep others from exercising their rights under the license.
> We can certainly distribute on DRM media, provided we do not turn on
> the "can't read" and "can't copy" bits.
What if someone do want to distribute on a DRM media that is per
design not copyable (aka the "can't copy"-bit set by definition)?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: