[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise

* Anthony DeRobertis (asd@suespammers.org) [030911 01:50]:
> On Monday, Sep 8, 2003, at 18:06 US/Eastern, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >The (intended) GFDL, on the other hand, explicitly prohibits us from
> >distributing on certain things.

> No, it doesn't. It explicitly prohibits us from using technical 
> measures to keep others from exercising their rights under the license. 
> We can certainly distribute on DRM media, provided we do not turn on 
> the "can't read" and "can't copy" bits.

What if someone do want to distribute on a DRM media that is per
design not copyable (aka the "can't copy"-bit set by definition)?

   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to: