Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
* Anthony DeRobertis (firstname.lastname@example.org) [030911 02:05]:
> On Tuesday, Sep 9, 2003, at 07:12 US/Eastern, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> >This has been discussed recently and it was so not clear.
> The poll held recently made it very clear. Who has changed their
> position since then?
Former "DFSG is not the right thing to measure", now "GFDL is not free
according to DFSG".
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C