[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal

* Anthony DeRobertis (asd@suespammers.org) [030911 02:05]:
> On Tuesday, Sep 9, 2003, at 07:12 US/Eastern, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> >This has been discussed recently and it was so not clear.

> The poll held recently made it very clear. Who has changed their 
> position since then?


Former "DFSG is not the right thing to measure", now "GFDL is not free
according to DFSG".

   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to: