debian-legal Aug 2003 by date

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 2 of 3

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Aug 15

Re: Bug#202723: perl-doc: Non-free manpage included Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Jimmy Kaplowitz
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Jeremy Hankins
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Fedor Zuev
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Joe Moore
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Fedor Zuev
Re: gif-creating applications? Brian M. Carlson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Andrew Suffield
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Andrew Suffield
Re: gif-creating applications? Andrew Suffield

Aug 16

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Jimmy Kaplowitz
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem MJ Ray
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Fedor Zuev
FFII-online-protest against patents Felix E. Klee

Aug 17

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Matthew Garrett
Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH Joel Baker
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH Anthony DeRobertis

Aug 18

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem MJ Ray
Your're Next! Thanks
Re: Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH Joel Baker
ircd-hybrid and OpenSSL Joshua Kwan
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Wouter Verhelst
Re: ircd-hybrid and OpenSSL Andrew Suffield
license for newbiedoc Oohara Yuuma
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Richard Braakman
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Richard Braakman
Re: FFII-online-protest against patents Martin Schulze
Re: FFII-online-protest against patents Felix E. Klee
Re: FFII-online-protest against patents Glenn Maynard
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Manoj Srivastava
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Richard Braakman
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Richard Braakman
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH Joe Drew
Re: Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH Jeremy Hankins
Re: FFII-online-protest against patents Felix E. Klee
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Sergey V. Spiridonov

Aug 19

Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem MJ Ray
Re: license for newbiedoc Anthony DeRobertis
debian-legal needs a FAQ (was: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem) Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Andrew Suffield
Re: debian-legal needs a FAQ (was: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem) MJ Ray
Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Adam Warner
Moving from BSD original to GPL Francesco Paolo Lovergine
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Branden Robinson
Re: FFII-online-protest against patents Branden Robinson
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Wouter Verhelst

Aug 20

Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Walter Landry
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Peter S Galbraith
Advice on DFSG status of this licence Andrew Pollock
Re: Advice on DFSG status of this licence Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Adam Warner
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Peter S Galbraith
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Adam Warner
Re: FFII-online-protest against patents Neil McGovern
Re: Advice on DFSG status of this licence Josselin Mouette
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Walter Landry
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Anthony Towns
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Peter S Galbraith
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Manoj Srivastava
Re: Advice on DFSG status of this licence Joel Baker
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Don Armstrong
MHOA webmaster . autoresponder

Aug 21

Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Walter Landry
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Walter Landry
SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Branden Robinson
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? M. Drew Streib
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? David Schleef
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Stephen Stafford
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joe Wreschnig
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Don Armstrong
Re: Should our documentation be free? Manoj Srivastava
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Manoj Srivastava
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Mark Rafn
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Bas Zoetekouw
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Wouter Verhelst
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? iain d broadfoot
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Brian T. Sniffen
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Walter Landry
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Jeremy Hankins
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Stephen Ryan
Re: Should our documentation be free? Don Armstrong
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Don Armstrong
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Sergey Spiridonov
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Simon Law
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Bob Hilliard
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Doug Winter
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Peter S Galbraith
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Jacobo Tarrio
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joerg Wendland
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? John Goerzen
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Jamin W. Collins
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Peter Makholm
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Matthew Garrett
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Michael Schultheiss
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Florian Weimer
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joey Hess
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joel Baker
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? christophe barbe
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Dmitry Borodaenko
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Matthew Garrett
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Branden Robinson
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Manoj Srivastava
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Branden Robinson
[DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Branden Robinson
[DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Branden Robinson
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Kyle McMartin
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Romain FRANCOISE
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Bdale Garbee
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Jonerik Sjölander
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Josselin Mouette
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? paul cannon
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joerg Wendland
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Thomas Hood
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Brian T. Sniffen
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Russ Allbery
MBSOPPRAPP02 found VIRUS= I-Worm.Sobig.f.txt (Kaspersky) virus ANTIGEN_MBSOPPRAPP02
MBSOPPRAPP02 found FILE FILTER= *.pif file ANTIGEN_MBSOPPRAPP02

Aug 22

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Matthew Garrett
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Rob Weir
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Chris Lawrence
Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME Paul C. Bryan
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Sergey V. Spiridonov
Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Brian M. Carlson
Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME Brian M. Carlson
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Andrew Suffield
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Josselin Mouette
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Keith Dunwoody
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Raghavendra Bhat
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME Felix E. Klee
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Florian Weimer
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joerg Wendland
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? MJ Ray
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? MJ Ray
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Matthew Garrett
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Andreas Metzler
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joerg Wendland
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joerg Wendland
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? MJ Ray
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joerg Wendland
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Sam Hocevar
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joe Moore
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joerg Wendland
Re: Should our documentation be free? Manoj Srivastava
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Richard Braakman
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Matthew Garrett
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Keith Dunwoody
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? John Goerzen
A possible GFDL compromise John Goerzen
Re: Should our documentation be free? Andreas Metzler
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Sebastien Bacher
Re: Advice on DFSG status of this licence Andrew Suffield
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Andrew Suffield
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Andrew Suffield
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Jeremy Hankins
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Andrew Suffield
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? David B Harris
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? David B Harris
Re: A possible GFDL compromise David B Harris
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Mark Rafn
Re: Should our documentation be free? MJ Ray
Re: A possible GFDL compromise MJ Ray
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Andrew Suffield
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? MJ Ray
Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME Florian Weimer
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Henning Makholm
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Don Armstrong
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Fedor Zuev
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Scott James Remnant
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Henning Makholm
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Scott James Remnant
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible GFDL compromise John Goerzen
Re: Bug#181493: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Jeff Bailey
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Jamin W. Collins
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Steve Langasek
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Andrew Suffield
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? John Goerzen
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? MJ Ray
Re: A possible GFDL compromise David B Harris
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Brian T. Sniffen
Re: A possible GFDL compromise John Goerzen
Re: A possible GFDL compromise David B Harris
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Branden Robinson
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Branden Robinson
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Branden Robinson
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Branden Robinson
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Henning Makholm
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Henning Makholm
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Henning Makholm
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Henning Makholm
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? jorgland
Virus Found in message "Approved" Jane Morgan
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Joe Wreschnig
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Richard Braakman
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? David Schleef

Aug 23

Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Don Armstrong
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Manoj Srivastava
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? John Goerzen
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Fedor Zuev
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Joe Drew
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Sergey V. Spiridonov
SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Anthony Towns
Bug#181493: marked as done (glibc: Sun RPC code is non-free) Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Richard Braakman
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Andrew Suffield
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Andrew Suffield
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Adrien de Sentenac
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Matthew Garrett
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Anthony Towns
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Don Armstrong
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Steve Langasek
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Andrew Suffield
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Andrew Suffield
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Steve Langasek
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Steve Langasek
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Andrew Suffield
Re: perl modules' default licence Jakob Bohm

Aug 24

Demonstrations against Software Patents in Brussels, 27aug: Debian help? Henrion Benjamin
Re: A possible GFDL compromise John Goerzen
Re: A possible GFDL compromise John Goerzen
Re: A possible GFDL compromise John Goerzen
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? John Goerzen
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Nathanael Nerode
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Nathanael Nerode
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Anthony Towns
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Nathanael Nerode
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Nathanael Nerode
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Branden Robinson
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Wouter Verhelst
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Branden Robinson
[STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Branden Robinson
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Eduard Bloch
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joe Wreschnig
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joe Wreschnig
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Jakob Bohm
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Florian Weimer
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Andrew Suffield
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Andrew Suffield
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Richard Braakman
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Jérôme Marant
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Wouter Verhelst
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Wouter Verhelst
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Anthony Towns
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Scott James Remnant
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Andrew Suffield
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Joe Wreschnig
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Andrew Suffield
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Josselin Mouette
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Richard Stallman
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Wouter Verhelst
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Joe Wreschnig
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Andrew Suffield
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Joe Wreschnig
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Josselin Mouette
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Joe Wreschnig
Re: Bug#181493: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Branden Robinson
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Richard Braakman
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Branden Robinson
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Branden Robinson
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Branden Robinson
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Branden Robinson
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Branden Robinson
Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Andrew Suffield
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Branden Robinson
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Branden Robinson
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Josselin Mouette
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Branden Robinson
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Branden Robinson
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Branden Robinson
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Branden Robinson
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Branden Robinson
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Claus Färber
Worries about GPLv3 (was Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy) Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Steve Langasek
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Nathanael Nerode
Re: Worries about GPLv3 (was Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy) Joe Wreschnig
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Anthony DeRobertis
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Jacobo Tarrio

Aug 25

Re: A possible GFDL compromise David B Harris
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Joe Wreschnig
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Jacobo Tarrio
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Joe Wreschnig
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? David Starner
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? David Starner
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Dylan Thurston
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Dylan Thurston
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Branden Robinson
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Branden Robinson
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Branden Robinson
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Anthony Towns
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Tore Anderson
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Fedor Zuev
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Joe Wreschnig
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Joe Wreschnig
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Fedor Zuev
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Andreas Barth
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Don Armstrong
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Jérôme Marant
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Don Armstrong
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Fedor Zuev
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Joe Wreschnig
Re: A possible GFDL compromise David Starner
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Wouter Verhelst
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Jérôme Marant
Re: A possible GFDL compromise David Starner
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Matthew Garrett
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Josselin Mouette
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Josselin Mouette
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Josselin Mouette
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Josselin Mouette
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Andrew Suffield
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Andrew Suffield
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Andrew Suffield
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Jacobo Tarrio
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Jacobo Tarrio
Re: Bug#181493: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Joe Drew
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Richard Braakman
Re: Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Richard Braakman
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Richard Braakman
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Jacobo Tarrio
Legal status of software licences Aigars Mahinovs
Virus Found in message "That movie" Jane Morgan
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Joe Moore
Re: Legal status of software licences Wouter Verhelst
Re: Legal status of software licences Aigars Mahinovs
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Richard Stallman
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Richard Stallman
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Richard Stallman
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Andrew Suffield
Re: Legal status of software licences Andrew Suffield
Re: Legal status of software licences Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Re: Legal status of software licences Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Brian T. Sniffen
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? MJ Ray
Re: Legal status of software licences Barak Pearlmutter
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Fedor Zuev
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Fedor Zuev
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Joe Wreschnig
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Florian Weimer
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Josselin Mouette
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Branden Robinson
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Steve Langasek
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Fedor Zuev
Re: Legal status of software licences Richard Braakman
Re: A possible GFDL compromise David B Harris
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Yven Johannes Leist
Re: Bug#181493: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Branden Robinson
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Josselin Mouette
Re: Bug#181493: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Joe Drew
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Josselin Mouette
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Branden Robinson
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Andrew Suffield
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Andrew Suffield
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Sergey V. Spiridonov
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Dylan Thurston
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Anthony DeRobertis
Re: A possible GFDL compromise David Starner

Aug 26

Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Nathanael Nerode
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Matthew Garrett
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Nathanael Nerode
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Richard Stallman
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Joe Wreschnig
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Joe Wreschnig
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Don Armstrong
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Steve Langasek
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Wouter Verhelst
license clarification for IRRToolSet Joerg Wendland
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Stephen Stafford
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Sergey Spiridonov
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet
Re: license clarification for IRRToolSet MJ Ray
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Jérôme Marant
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Steve Langasek
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Jérôme Marant
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Nathanael Nerode
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Nathanael Nerode
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Anthony Towns
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Anthony Towns
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Dmitry Borodaenko
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Branden Robinson
Re: Bug#181493: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Branden Robinson
Decision GFDL Wouter Vanden Hove
Bug#181493: Info received (was Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free) Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Don Armstrong
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Branden Robinson
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Branden Robinson
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Branden Robinson
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Branden Robinson
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Branden Robinson
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Brian T. Sniffen
Re: license clarification for IRRToolSet Branden Robinson
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Andrew Suffield
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Jérôme Marant
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Jérôme Marant
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Decision GFDL Branden Robinson
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Joe Wreschnig

Aug 27

Re: Decision GFDL Adam Warner
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy MJ Ray
Re: Decision GFDL MJ Ray
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Jeremy Malcolm
Re: Demonstrations against Software Patents in Brussels, 27aug: Debian help? Jordi Mallach
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Mark Rafn
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Steve Langasek
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Manoj Srivastava
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Fedor Zuev
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Nathanael Nerode
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Fedor Zuev
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Fedor Zuev
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Fedor Zuev
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Jérôme Marant
Re: Re: A possible GFDL compromise David Starner
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Jérôme Marant
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Josselin Mouette
Re: A possible GFDL compromise David Starner
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Wouter Verhelst
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Fedor Zuev
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Josselin Mouette

The last update was on 06:02 GMT Tue May 28. There are 1420 messages. Page 2 of 3.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 2 of 3

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc