Re: Dissident versus ASP

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

> The claim is that:
> 
> 	Dissident test + Practical objections == Can't close the ASP loophole
> 
> and, furthermore that that equality goes both ways. That is that
> the Dissident test is just another way of saying that the only ways
> you're allowed to close the ASP loophole are ones which are practically
> unreasonable.

Sorry, when I say I agree with this claim, I mean the => direction.

The <= direction is surely false; for example, I formulated the
dissident test long before the ASP loophole (of any sort) had ever
been pointed out to me.