debian-legal Mar 2003 by date

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 2 of 2

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mar 10

Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
RE: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes Jim Popovitch
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Steve Langasek
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Steve Langasek
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Don Armstrong
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Mark Rafn
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes hec
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes Glenn Maynard
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes Hugo ESpuny
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes Francesco P. Lovergine
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Henning Makholm
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Henning Makholm
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Henning Makholm
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Henning Makholm
Re: PHPNuke license John Goerzen
Re: PHPNuke license Glenn Maynard
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Brian T. Sniffen
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes Mark Rafn
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Glenn Maynard
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes Steve Langasek
Re: lzw patent search (fwd) Drew Scott Daniels
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes Walter Landry
Re: lzw patent search (fwd) Drew Scott Daniels
Re: transformations of 'source code' Joe Moore
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Brian T. Sniffen
Re: transformations of 'source code' Joe Moore
Re: PHPNuke license David Turner
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Joe Moore
Re: PHPNuke license David Turner
Barriers to an ASP loophole closure (was Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!) Jeremy Hankins
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Glenn Maynard
Re: DRAFT DFSG FAQ Joe Moore
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) David Turner
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) David Turner
Re: PHPNuke license Don Armstrong
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: DRAFT DFSG FAQ Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure (was Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Glenn Maynard
Re: DRAFT DFSG FAQ David Turner
Re: PHPNuke license Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: PHPNuke license Walter Landry
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Jeremy Hankins
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Walter Landry
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure (was Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!) Nick Phillips
Re: PHPNuke license John Goerzen
Re: PHPNuke license John Goerzen
RE: lzw patent search (fwd) Drew Scott Daniels
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Brian T. Sniffen
RE: lzw patent search Drew Scott Daniels
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Glenn Maynard
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Glenn Maynard
Re: PHPNuke license Glenn Maynard
Re: The Affero license Branden Robinson
GPLv3 2(d) (was Re: PHPNuke license) David Turner
Re: PHPNuke license Branden Robinson
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Branden Robinson
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes Richard Braakman
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Henning Makholm
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Branden Robinson
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Branden Robinson
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Branden Robinson
Re: PHPNuke license David Turner
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Branden Robinson
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) David Turner
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes Branden Robinson
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes Branden Robinson
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Henning Makholm
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! David Turner
Re: PHPNuke license Don Armstrong
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Henning Makholm
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! David Turner
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! David Turner
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! David Turner

Mar 11

Re: Bug#183672: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes Hugo Espuny
Re: OCAML QPL Issue James Troup
Re: The Affero license James Troup
Re: PHPNuke license Nick Phillips
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes Brian Nelson
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Anthony Towns
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Anthony Towns
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Anthony Towns
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure (was Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!) Anthony Towns
Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test Andrea Glorioso
is scilab really non-free? Torsten Werner
Re: The Affero license Richard Braakman
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Richard Braakman
Re: The Affero license Anthony Towns
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Richard Braakman
Re: is scilab really non-free? Joerg Jaspert
Considering packaging T.Rex firewall, is it free? Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Bernhard R. Link
Bug#183672: PHP-Nuke: copyright report Hugo Espuny
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Joe Moore
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Brian T. Sniffen
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Jeremy Hankins
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Jeremy Hankins
RE: lzw patent search (fwd) Drew Scott Daniels
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Jeremy Hankins
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Jeremy Hankins
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Brian T. Sniffen
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Henning Makholm
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Henning Makholm
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Glenn Maynard
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Anthony Towns
Re: The Affero license Henning Makholm
Re: lzw patent search (fwd) Glenn Maynard
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Anthony Towns
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure (was Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!) Steve Langasek
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Brian T. Sniffen
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Brian T. Sniffen
Re: lzw patent search (fwd) Drew Scott Daniels
Re: Bug#183672: PHP-Nuke: copyright report Mark Rafn
Dual licensed software Luis Bustamante
Re: Bug#183672: PHP-Nuke: copyright report Hugo Espuny
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure (was Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!) Stephen Ryan
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Affero license Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Dual licensed software James Troup
Re: Dual licensed software Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Affero license David Turner
Re: Bug#183672: PHP-Nuke: copyright report Mark Rafn
Re: Dual licensed software Glenn Maynard
The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Bug#183672: PHP-Nuke: copyright report Hugo Espuny
Re: Bug#183672: PHP-Nuke: copyright report Mark Rafn
Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test David Turner
Re: PHPNuke license Walter Landry
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! David Turner
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! David Turner
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! David Turner
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure David Turner
Re: lzw patent search (fwd) Richard Braakman
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure David Turner
Re: Dual licensed software Glenn Maynard
Re: Dual licensed software Don Armstrong
Re: The Affero license Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Dual licensed software Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure (was Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!) David Turner
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! David Turner
Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Glenn Maynard
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Glenn Maynard
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns

Mar 12

Standard non-copyleft free license? Terry Hancock
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) David Turner
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) David Turner
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Glenn Maynard
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes David Turner
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? David Turner
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Mark Rafn
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far David Turner
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Don Armstrong
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Don Armstrong
Re: The Show So Far David Turner
Re: PHP-Nuke: A calling for votes David Turner
Re: The Show So Far Glenn Maynard
Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test David Turner
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian David Turner
Re: transformations of "source code" David Turner
Re: PHPNuke license David Turner
Re: PHPNuke license David Turner
Re: The Show So Far Glenn Maynard
Re: PHPNuke license David Turner
Re: The Affero license David Turner
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Glenn Maynard
Re: The Show So Far David Turner
Re: The Affero license Glenn Maynard
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) David Turner
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure David Turner
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure David Turner
Re: The Show So Far Glenn Maynard
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) David Turner
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Glenn Maynard
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Branden Robinson
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Branden Robinson
Re: transformations of "source code" Branden Robinson
Re: PHPNuke license Branden Robinson
Re: PHPNuke license Branden Robinson
Re: PHPNuke license Branden Robinson
Re: The Affero license Branden Robinson
Re: PHPNuke license Branden Robinson
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Branden Robinson
Re: The Affero license Branden Robinson
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Branden Robinson
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Branden Robinson
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Branden Robinson
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Branden Robinson
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Anthony Towns
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: The Affero license Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Glenn Maynard
Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test Andrea Glorioso
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Glenn Maynard
GPLv3 / Affero / RPSL Anthony Towns
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Richard Braakman
Re: The Show So Far Stephen Ryan
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Jeremy Hankins
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Jeremy Hankins
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Jeremy Hankins
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Jeremy Hankins
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Jeremy Hankins
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Jeremy Hankins
Re: The Show So Far Jeremy Hankins
Re: The Show So Far David Turner
The ASP nightmare: a description (was Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!) Jeremy Hankins
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Terry Hancock
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! David Turner
Re: PHPNuke license Don Armstrong
Re: The Show So Far Terry Hancock
Re: The ASP nightmare: a description (was Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!) Joe Moore
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Mark Rafn
Re: The ASP nightmare: a description (was Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!) Bernhard R. Link
Re: PHPNuke license Walter Landry
Re: The Show So Far Steve Langasek
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Henning Makholm
Re: Considering packaging T.Rex firewall, is it free? Henning Makholm
GPL clients for non-free services Mark Rafn
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Jeremy Hankins
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Henning Makholm

Mar 13

AGPL threads David Turner
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Richard Braakman
Re: The Show So Far Terry Hancock
Re: The Show So Far Glenn Maynard
Re: The Show So Far Steve Langasek
Re: The Show So Far Bernhard R. Link
Re: The ASP nightmare: a description Jeremy Hankins
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Jeremy Hankins
Re: GPL clients for non-free services Steve Langasek
Re: The ASP nightmare: a description Brian T. Sniffen
Re: GPL clients for non-free services Mark Rafn
Re: The ASP nightmare: a description Joe Moore
Re: GPL clients for non-free services Joe Moore
Re: GPL clients for non-free services Anthony Towns
Re: The ASP nightmare: a description Stephen Ryan
Fitness and Bodybuilding Update Body and Mind Online
Re: The Show So Far Terry Hancock
Re: The Show So Far Glenn Maynard

Mar 14

Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The ASP nightmare: a description Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: The Show So Far Terry Hancock
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Terry Hancock
Re: The Show So Far Steve Langasek
ASP loophole - where is the line Mark Rafn
Re: The Show So Far Steve Langasek
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure [OT note about XP EULA] Jakob Bohm
Is epic package non-free? Gustavo Franco
Re: The Show So Far Joe Moore
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Is epic package non-free? Simon Law
Forced publication requirement and import/export restrictions Alexander Cherepanov
Re: The Show So Far Jeremy Hankins
Re: Is epic package non-free? Gustavo Franco
Re: Is epic package non-free? Anthony Towns
Re: Is epic package non-free? Simon Law
Re: Bug#184670: Is epic package non-free? James Troup
Re: Is epic package non-free? Gustavo Franco
Re: Is epic package non-free? Gustavo Franco
Re: Is epic package non-free? Simon Law
Re: Is epic package non-free? Gustavo Franco
Re: PHPNuke license Branden Robinson
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Branden Robinson
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Branden Robinson
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Branden Robinson
Re: Barriers to an ASP loophole closure Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Should the ASP loophole be fixed? (Re: The Affero license) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
QPL clause 3 is not DFSG-free Branden Robinson
Re: The ASP nightmare: a description (was Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!) Branden Robinson
Re: GPLv3 / Affero / RPSL Branden Robinson
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Branden Robinson
Re: Considering packaging T.Rex firewall, is it free? Branden Robinson
Re: Dual licensed software Branden Robinson
Bug#184806: Copyright notices are lacking Simon Law
Re: The ASP nightmare: a description (was Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion!) Michael Schultheiss
Re: The Show So Far Branden Robinson
Re: GPLv3 / Affero / RPSL John Goerzen
Re: ASP loophole - where is the line Branden Robinson
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Branden Robinson
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Branden Robinson
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: ASP loophole - where is the line Anthony Towns

Mar 15

Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Don Armstrong
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: QPL clause 3 is not DFSG-free Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: QPL clause 3 is not DFSG-free Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Mar 16

Re: QPL clause 3 is not DFSG-free Terry Hancock
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: JpGraph License Question [From the author] JpGraph
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Henning Makholm
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Henning Makholm
Re: ASP loophole - where is the line Henning Makholm
Roundup copyright DFSG free (take 2)? Bastian Kleineidam
Re: Is LPPL + some additions DSFG free? Rene Engelhard
Re: ASP loophole - where is the line Jakob Bohm
Re: ASP loophole - where is the line Anthony Towns
Re: Roundup copyright DFSG free (take 2)? Richard Jones
Re: JpGraph License Question [From the author] Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: JpGraph License Question [From the author] Henning Makholm
Re: Roundup copyright DFSG free (take 2)? Bastian Kleineidam

Mar 17

Re: JpGraph License Question [From the author] Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Branden Robinson
Re: QPL clause 3 is not DFSG-free Branden Robinson
Re: QPL clause 3 is not DFSG-free Branden Robinson
Re: OCAML QPL Issue Branden Robinson
Re: GPLv3 / Affero / RPSL Branden Robinson
Re: ASP loophole - where is the line Branden Robinson
Re: The Show So Far Branden Robinson
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Branden Robinson
Re: JpGraph License Question [From the author] Branden Robinson
Re: Is LPPL + some additions DSFG free? Branden Robinson
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Dissident versus ASP Anthony Towns
Re: The Show So Far Bernhard R. Link
Re: QPL clause 3 is not DFSG-free Henning Makholm
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Henning Makholm
Re: JpGraph License Question [From the author] Henning Makholm
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Jeremy Hankins
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Henning Makholm
Re: Bug#184806: Copyright notices are lacking Henning Makholm
Re: The Show So Far Jeremy Hankins
Re: GPLv3 / Affero / RPSL John Goerzen
Re: Dissident versus ASP Jeremy Hankins
Re: The Show So Far Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Bug#184806: Copyright notices are lacking Simon Law
Re: Dissident versus ASP Bernhard R. Link
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Don Armstrong
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Dissident versus ASP Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Dissident versus ASP Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: QPL clause 3 is not DFSG-free Henning Makholm
Re: QPL clause 3 is not DFSG-free Jakob Bohm
Re: Dissident versus ASP Anthony Towns
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: Dissident versus ASP Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Dissident versus ASP Jakob Bohm
Re: Dissident versus ASP Richard Braakman

Mar 18

Re: QPL clause 3 is not DFSG-free Richard Braakman
Re: Dissident versus ASP Anthony Towns
Re: Dissident versus ASP Anthony Towns
Re: Dissident versus ASP Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Dissident versus ASP Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Nick Phillips
Re: Dissident versus ASP Anthony Towns
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Anthony Towns
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: OSD && DFSG - different purposes - constructive suggestion! Nick Phillips
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Dissident versus ASP Thomas Bushnell, BSG
[no subject] rick
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: Dissident versus ASP Anthony Towns
Re: Dissident versus ASP Henning Makholm
Re: Dissident versus ASP Richard Braakman
Re: Dissident versus ASP Anthony Towns
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Branden Robinson
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Branden Robinson
Re: QPL clause 3 is not DFSG-free Branden Robinson
Re: Dissident versus ASP Jeremy Hankins
Re: Dissident versus ASP Jeremy Hankins
Re: The Show So Far Jeremy Hankins
Re: The Show So Far Branden Robinson
Re: GPLv3 / Affero / RPSL Branden Robinson
Re: The Show So Far Jeremy Hankins
Re: The Show So Far Branden Robinson
Re: The Show So Far Branden Robinson
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Branden Robinson
Re: Dissident versus ASP Branden Robinson
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Don Armstrong
#153467: libjpeg62: JPEG is patent-encumbered Bill Allombert
Re: Dissident versus ASP Henning Makholm

Mar 19

Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Dissident versus ASP Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Dissident versus ASP Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Dissident versus ASP Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Anthony Towns
Re: Dissident versus ASP Bernhard R. Link
Re: Standard non-copyleft free license? Branden Robinson
Re: Dissident versus ASP Jeremy Hankins
Re: Dissident versus ASP Jeremy Hankins
Re: Dissident versus ASP Jeremy Hankins
Re: The Show So Far Jeremy Hankins
Re: Dissident versus ASP Stephen Ryan
Re: Dissident versus ASP Bernhard R. Link
Re: Dissident versus ASP Nick Phillips
Re: Dissident versus ASP Mark Rafn
Re: Dissident versus ASP Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Dissident versus ASP Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: The Show So Far Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Jakob Bohm
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Henning Makholm

Mar 20

Re: Dissident versus ASP Jakob Bohm
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Jakob Bohm
License for Standards Spec? Terry Hancock
Re: License for Standards Spec? Mark Rafn
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Branden Robinson

Mar 21

Re: License for Standards Spec? Joey Hess

Mar 22

proftpd-mysql: links against OpenSSL and GPL licensed libmysqlclient10 Francesco Paolo Lovergine
Re: Dissident versus ASP Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho

Mar 23

MPL 1.0? John Goerzen
Re: MPL 1.0? Jeremy Malcolm
Re: [juhtolv@cc.jyu.fi: Pandora - a non-free font family?] Juhapekka Tolvanen

Mar 24

Re: MPL 1.0? John Goerzen

Mar 26

Re: Dissident versus ASP Anthony DeRobertis
Re: the FSF's definition of Free Software and its value for Debian Anthony DeRobertis
Re: MPL 1.0? Anthony DeRobertis

Mar 27

mrouted and non-free Antonin Kral

Mar 28

Re: mrouted and non-free Branden Robinson
Re: mrouted and non-free Herbert Xu

Mar 31

License with the following characteristics? Nathanael Nerode
Re: License with the following characteristics? Walter Landry
Re: License with the following characteristics? Mark Rafn
Re: License with the following characteristics? Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: License with the following characteristics? Andrew Suffield

The last update was on 14:26 GMT Wed May 01. There are 983 messages. Page 2 of 2.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 2 of 2

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc