Re: Dissident versus ASP

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

> Or else stop fudging around the topic.
> 
> The claim is that:
> 
> 	Dissident test + Practical objections == Can't close the ASP loophole
> 
> and, furthermore that that equality goes both ways. That is that
> the Dissident test is just another way of saying that the only ways
> you're allowed to close the ASP loophole are ones which are practically
> unreasonable.

I'm not fudging, I'm saying that, in all the cases I've thought about,
I agree with your claim.  I can't make statements about cases that I
haven't thought about.