Re: Dissident versus ASP
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> writes:
> Or else stop fudging around the topic.
> The claim is that:
> Dissident test + Practical objections == Can't close the ASP loophole
> and, furthermore that that equality goes both ways. That is that
> the Dissident test is just another way of saying that the only ways
> you're allowed to close the ASP loophole are ones which are practically
I'm not fudging, I'm saying that, in all the cases I've thought about,
I agree with your claim. I can't make statements about cases that I
haven't thought about.