On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:42:34AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Anthony Towns <email@example.com> writes: > > If your program is not distributed to anyone, then the license cannot > > require you to distribute it to anyone (no matter how many people > > use it or for what purpose, etc). > > Which is to say that, if accepted, the Dissident test and the practical > > concerns we have about providing source over SMS and such, imply that > > no free license can ever close the ASP loophole. > Since there are fifteen things floating around, each of which gets > called "the ASP loophole", it's hard to be certain. Name one that it doesn't apply to? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Description: PGP signature