[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dissident versus ASP

On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:42:34AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> >     If your program is not distributed to anyone, then the license cannot
> >     require you to distribute it to anyone (no matter how many people
> >     use it or for what purpose, etc).
> > Which is to say that, if accepted, the Dissident test and the practical
> > concerns we have about providing source over SMS and such, imply that
> > no free license can ever close the ASP loophole.
> Since there are fifteen things floating around, each of which gets
> called "the ASP loophole", it's hard to be certain.

Name one that it doesn't apply to?


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
        you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''

Attachment: pgpBayQOpTf7j.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: