On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 05:47:44PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > 1. requiring that modified source be distributed as patches+original > > (so, no public CVS, since cvs co gives fully-merged source). > We have a general consensus that this was a hoop we should not have > permitted. No, we do not. It's something that upstream authors should not require, but it does not make something non-free. Bad != Non-free. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Description: PGP signature