On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 05:47:44PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > 1. requiring that modified source be distributed as patches+original
> > (so, no public CVS, since cvs co gives fully-merged source).
> We have a general consensus that this was a hoop we should not have
> permitted.
No, we do not.
It's something that upstream authors should not require, but it does not
make something non-free. Bad != Non-free.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Attachment:
pgpEkWn4xDG0y.pgp
Description: PGP signature