[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PHPNuke license



On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 06:36:08PM -0500, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003, David Turner wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 14:19, John Goerzen wrote:
> >> BUT -- (2)(c) ONLY takes effect if the user is distributing the
> >> source to a modified program AND that program is intractive.
> > 
> > No!  (2)(c) doesn't contain the first part of that -- it doesn't
> > require distribution!  See my other messages in this thread.
> 
> You're ignoring 2 itself:
> 
>    2.  You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any
>    portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy
>    and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of
>    Section 1 above, provided that you also meet all of these
>    conditions:[4]

What exactly am I ignoring here?  Nothing here seems to require that I
distribute modified copies.  In fact, the [1] you cited agrees with me.

> 
> Additionally, fair use itself limits even the applicability of the
> copyright, as explained in [1] [2] and [3].
> 
> 
> Don Armstrong
> 
> 1: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200303/msg00121.html
> 2: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200303/msg00168.html
> 3: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200303/msg00261.html
> 4: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
> -- 
> "There's nothing remarkable about it.  All one has to do is hit the    
> right keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself." Bach 
> 
> http://www.donarmstrong.com
> http://www.anylevel.com
> http://rzlab.ucr.edu




Reply to: